Re: Fran Saunders - Long Lenses
Fran Saunders (saunderf@ARI.Net)
Thu, 15 Jan 1998 17:38:08 +0000
Jack, thanks for the additional information on Minoltas. Norm
is currently intrigued with the Canons, but I have had Minoltas
since I started taking serious pictures. I've been using an APS
camera for the web site pictures--some of you may have noticed
the birding locale pictures and signs that make up the quiz
section--with good results, but I find that I am losing
opportunities.
For instance, in AZ we participated in a banding exercise for a
PhD candidate out there. We had great opportunities to see the
birds in hand after they were banded. This was an incredible
view of the field marks and plumage. Why, I could see nearly
every feather and trim quite distinctly. But by golly my little
camera pushed the bird into the distance. It actually appeared
smaller than it did to my naked eye. What a disappointment! So
I am learning that different cameras for different situations
may be the way to go.
I am going to look into the Tamron you suggested, since that it
is a very reasonable price given that we already have one long
lens. I think I mentioned we already have the 500mm Minolta
mirror lens for our cameras and ours is very compact, although
much wider than other lenses.
That being said, what can one do to minimize the donuts????
Fran
--------------------------------
Fran Saunders
Maryland Ornithological Society
State Web Site Director
saunderf@ari.net
http://www2.ari.net/saunderf/mos/mos.html