Greg's and Tyler's posts have struck a nerve. So let me put out a "soapbox message" of my own. It's important to be skeptical about rare bird reports, but there are times when arrogance comes into play. I've had a few experiences of the skeptical kind lately regarding my reports from Wakefield Park. I don't mind skepticism because it's an important part of the process of verifying reports as much as possible. I actually expected it because I couldn't believe some of the birds that kept showing up. I had hoped that the skeptics would go silent after other birders who were attracted to Wakefield Park by my reports saw Sedge Wren and Connecticut, Mourning, and Brewster's Warblers. But then I saw a MacGillivray's Warbler on Saturday. Having recently experienced skepticism, I was extremely reluctant to report this bird. But I did and my report to the hotline was completely ignored. You'd think it would have at least warranted a few questions. How many other reports of MacGillivray's Warblers in this area have been squelched? I'll bet a fair number of them find their way to the east coast every year. Good numbers of Mourning and Connecticut Warblers stray far to the west of their ranges. About 80 of them have been observed at just one site in California. Why wouldn't one expect similar numbers of MacGillivray's Warblers in the east? And if one were to show up, wouldn't Wakefield Park--which has had 9 Mourning Warblers and 5 Connecticut Warblers this year--be a reasonable place? To end on a positive note, I'd like to add that it's been a lot of fun meeting those of you who have stopped by to check out Wakefield Park. Hopefully we'll get another front and more good birds in the next few days. Mike Collins Annandale, Virginia collins@ram.nrl.navy.mil