A while back I read where the Ringed Turtle-Dove was no longer considered a wild bird anywhere in the world. It has been reduced to the status of strictly a cage bird. > ---------- > From: Phil Davis[SMTP:pdavis@ix.netcom.com] > Reply To: mdosprey@ARI.Net > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 2:12 AM > To: mdosprey@ARI.Net; Mike Milton; BirdChat@listserv.ARIZONA.edu > Subject: Re: Eurasian Collared-Dove > > ***** WARNING: Four letter banding codes are used in this message ... > parental discretion is recommended ***** > > Mike - > > Only recently was documentation on the Ft. McHenry, MD "Ringed > Turtle-Doves" (RITD) deposited with the MD/DC Records Committee, by Bob > Ringler. I think no one has any doubt that these were RITDs. They do > differ from Eurasian Collared Doves (EUCD) by overall color, wing pattern > and vocalization. > > The AOU [7th edition checklist] considers the RIDT (C. risoria) as > "introduced and established in west-central Florida (Pinellas County), the > Bahamas (New Providence), Puerto Rico, and apparently in eastern Texas > (Houston Region) and Alabama (Montgomery). Other North American > populations (e.g., in Los Angeles) have failed to become established". > > The EUCD (C. decaoto) is considered by the AOU to be "common and abundant > from the Tampa and Palm Beach to southern Florida; also established > locally > in coastal Georgia, South Carolina, and southeastern Louisiana, occurring > casually to North Carolina ... and Pennsylvania ... [with references to a > few other states]". > > I pretty sure the ABA has "delisted" the RITD, in spite of the AOU > assertion that they are established. This would indicate that neither > Florida, nor any other states, include the RITD on their state list (at > least not any more). > > I will copy this message to Birdchat, since I'm interested to see what > Florida birders have to say about this. > > The MD/DCRC would certainly be interested in any reports of EUCD. Recent > sightings of single RITDs have been "presumed" to be escapees ... but ... > ??? > > Thx. > > Phil > > > At 03:32 AM 05/12/1999 -0400, Mike Milton wrote: > > A further historical question -- what about the birds reported in > >Maryland Birdlife 37(2): 48, (Winter Season, R. Ringler) as follows: > > "At Fort McHenry the Ringed Turtle Doves had a nest > >with 2 eggs on Feb. 27 [1980] (Bielenberg)." > > There are other reports, e.g. Maryland Birdlife 37(1): 33: "A > >Ringed Turtle Dove was reported in Silver Spring on Aug. 5 [1980] (Betty > >Collins)." > > > > As I recall, populations, including those in Florida, which are now > >accepted without controversy as Streptopelia decaocto, Eurasian > >Collared-Dove, were generally called S. risoria, Ringed Turtle-Dove, > >circa 1980. The more current books I have at hand indicate that escaped > >or feral "risoria" are occasionally seen, are distinguishable from > >decaocto both by voice and plumage, and that the name "risoria" should > >be reserved for the domesticated variety of S. risogrisea, African > >Collared-Dove. > > I assume that there has been no reason for the MD-DC Records > >Committee (or the Yellow Book) to be concerned with any Streptopelia, > >in view of their origin and absence of a sustaining population here. > >But were the Fort McHenry birds decaocto, or "risoria", and should I > >finally delete rosogrisea from my Grand Unedited Illegitimate Personal > >World List? > > > > ================================================ > Phil Davis, Secretary > MD/DC Records Committee > > home: PDavis@ix.netcom.com Davidsonville, Maryland USA > work: PDavis@OAO.com Greenbelt, Maryland USA > > MD/DCRC Web site: http://www.MDBirds.org > ================================================ >