Marcia Watson-Whitmyre's alert on chlorfenapyr is well taken. Here's what it says within the web site for for EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs ( http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/ where one finds info on specific pesticides by entering the name in the search box on the upper left): Chlorfenapyr is a member of a new class of chemical compounds known as "pyrroles"- a class which has a unique mode of action, clear economic benefits to the cotton industry, and data indicating avian reproductive effects. OPP has concluded that the use of chlorfenapyr on cotton meets the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) standard of a "reasonable certainty of no harm" with respect to human health; and, that it has not been found to be carcinogenic. In addition, chlorfenapyr has clear economic benefits to the cotton industry because it can play an important role in control of several important cotton pests. However, chlorfenapyr appears to be persistent in the environment, and studies show a potential adverse impact to wildlife, particularly birds. For these reasons - and our limited experience with pyrroles - we believe this chemical presents special issues for pesticide regulation. Accordingly, we are taking this extra step of seeking public comment, of a specific nature, on this chemicalīs human health and ecological risk, and benefits assessments before we make any regulatory decision. All the material in the docket on chlorfenapyr can be reviewed at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reg_assessment/toc.htm EPA's Risk Assessment document http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reg_assessment/memoeco.pdf concludes that "terrestrial wildlife dietary residues associate with all label application rates present a substantial risk to avian species both for acute lethal effects and impairment of reproduction. The exposure opportunities for acute lethal effects occur for many days following treatment. ...... Timing of chlorfenapyr applications to the cotton crop coincide with the reproductive window of most of the more than 50 species of birds that the registrant reports to be associated with cotton fields." At the bottom of that page, under "An Avian Ecological Risk Assessment for Chlorfenapyr in Cotton" there are ten relevant documents submitted by the maker of chlorfenapyr, American Cyanamid. Their Executive Summary is at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reg_assessment/pirate_7.pdf which will require the use of the Adobe Acrobat Reader (which can be downloaded free from Adobe's net site by clicking on the "Free Acrobrat Reader" message near the top of the page) to access.....and be ready for a long down-load of the 1284K document. As for sending an e-mail to Browner....well, don't expect it to be read, let alone have any impact. A hard copy to Carol M. Browner, Administrator US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 showing copies to your Senators and Representatives will, in the long run, be far more effective. David Strother Bethesda dstrother@pop.dn.net