--part1_0.7bbc9e81.25575d11_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have revised my earlier description of the YBLO based on research I did today while the Redskins were tanking. I think this will help. --part1_0.7bbc9e81.25575d11_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; name="Yellow-billed Loon 11/4/99" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Yellow-billed Loon 11/4/99" Yellow-billed Loon=0DPatuxent River Opposite Seabreeze Restaurant =0DSt. Mar= y's County, MD=0DNovember 4, 1999=0D=0DObservers: Paul J. O'Brien, Maryland= =0D John Gatchet, Idaho=0D=0DAt approximately 12:30PM I obse= rved a bird with the overall size and shape of a Common Loon, but exhibiting= a light yellow bill, floating, preening and occasionally diving in the rive= r near the Calvert Co. shoreline. It was located at the south end of a larg= e grassy area, the southern of two such grassy areas on the opposite shore. = The day was clear and bright with the sun high but behind me. My attention= was first drawn to the bill which stood out prominently, even at such a gre= at distance. I was using a Swarovski AT 80 HD spotting scope at 60 power. = Initially there was some shimmer that subsequently diminished. There were = four Common Loons working the near shore, but they never approached the YBLO= for direct comparisons.=0D=0DOverall the bird appeared to be in mid-molt fr= om alternate to basic plumage. The crown and nape were dark chocolate brown= which did not contrast with the brown back. The throat and foreneck were w= hitish with a noticable dark brown neck ring just above the water line. The= brown crown and nape extended below the eye and down the sides of the neck = so that the auriculars were still in a dark field. Thus the dark auricular = spot was not yet visible. The distance was too great to discern the buffy s= calloping on the back mentioned by Charlie Muise on his first observation of= Nov. 3, nor did I notice whether the high point of the back was over the sh= oulders or further back. The outstanding feature of the bird was its bill, = which was thick at the base with an apparently straight culmen. The lower m= andible was straight for about half its length exhibiting a sharp gonydeal b= reak upwards, thence straight to the tip. The entire length of the bill was= straw yellow with what appeared to be dusky areas near the base of the culm= en and the base of the lower mandible at the throat. To accentuate the upwa= rd thrust of the lower mandible, the bird held its bill slightly above horiz= ontal the entire time.=0D=0DAt about 1PM John Gatchet arrived to photograph = the Kelp Gull. Having spent many years along the northwest coast he had see= n many YBLOs and immediately confirmed the identification. After about 10 m= inutes the bird began diving repeatedly and thereafter spent very little tim= e on the surface, which John noted was typical YBLO behavior, and of the YBL= O I observed Dec. 26, 1997 in Oswego, NY. It worked its way upstream past t= he northernmost grassy area to a pair of docks. Its surface appearances las= ted only a few seconds, not enough time to get it in focus. Finally, about = 2:55, it took off and flew far downstream. At first it gained altitude and = was well above the tree line, passing two signal towers, then descended, onl= y to be lost from sight when it went below the tree line. The distance coul= d have been consistent with the mouth of St. Leonard's Creek, where it may h= ave been seen the next morning by Greg Miller. In flight the bill again was= the most outstanding feature, but there appeared to be two dark brown rings= on the fully extended neck. The entire underside was white and the feet pl= us an equal length of tarsus protruded beyond the tail tip. Oddly, the feet= and tarsi appeared dusky pinkish. Whether this was a trick of the lighting= or is some age or gender related feature is not clear. The flying bird res= embled a Common Loon in size and shape but the flight seemed more ponderous.= The entire upper surface appeared uniformly dark. I did not notice whethe= r there were white primary shafts.=0D=0DClarifications added later:=0D=0DReg= arding the intermediate stage of molt that I suggested, in A Field Guide to = the Rare Birds of Britain and Europe, Harper Collins, 1991, page 27, the aut= hors (Lewington, Alstrom and Colston), in discussing plumages of the White-b= illed Diver (YBLO), say the following: "Full winter plumage is often not rea= ched until late in the autumn/early winter." This would be consistent with = the molt condition of the bird we observed.=0D=0DI should have mentioned th= at, in flight, the bird continued to hold its bill above the horizontal and = that the bill stood out as large, prominent and light yellow.=0D=0DAlso rega= rding the flying bird, I noted that the feet and extended tarsi were a dusky= pink color. I consulted Ralph Palmer's Handbook of North American Birds, Y= ale Univ. Press, Vol. 1, page 36 and his discussion of the definitive altern= ate (i.e. breeding) plumage of YBLO contains the following statement: "Legs = and feet dark grayish brown on outer side, pale grayish flesh on inner and o= n webs, the last with pinkish tinge." In his description of Common Loon on= page 22 he says: "Legs black on outer side paling to medium gray on inner; = webs of feet dark with flesh-colored centers." Although silent about other = ages and plumages of YBLO, Palmer says on page 22 regarding definitive basic= plumage of COLO: "Legs and feet as in Def. Alt. stage." I distinctly saw a= pink tarsus and prominently pink feet, which should rule out COLO, assuming= that there are no dramatic changes in either species during molt to basic p= lumage. = = =0D=0DI should note that in stating that I did not = notice white primary shafts, I actually didn't think to look for them and, b= esides, I was busy studying the bill and the curious pink legs and feet.=0D= =0D=0DPaul J. O'Brien=0D12 Duke St. South=0DRockville, MD 20850-1014=0D301-4= 24-6491=0Dpobrien776@aol.com --part1_0.7bbc9e81.25575d11_boundary--