Bob,
To be honest, I did not get a good fix on the tail shape -- all I noted was
"forked." I was busy trying to get a good look at the underwings (no
extensive dark primaries were noted), shape and color of the bill (a substantial and
fairly long bill but not as deep or prominent as that of the Caspian I
thought and more to the orange end of the spectrum rather than bright red/orange)
and sorting out the apparently all black cap -- something I've personally
seen only a couple of times on the ROTE. There were a few first winter
Ring-billed Gulls flying around at the same time and it took me a few seconds to note
the thinner, longer wings and the downward pointing bill posture of the two
terns as they flew in and their more leisurely wingbeats as compared to a
Forster's. They struck me as being near the size of the Ring-bills but more
streamlined. The underbody was bright white and the upperparts uniform light
gray. I noted no markings or colors that would lead me to think it was a
juvenile bird. I waited for half an hour but they did not return from their one
pass. It was about 11:15 a.m. with a fairly bright sky and I had them in view
for about 45 seconds. They did not call.
I realize that bill color can be quite variable in the terns, so I guess my
id rests pretty much on my impression of bill size and the lack of dark
underwing primaries to separate it from the Caspian Tern. That and "jiz". I've
always felt the Caspian was a deeper-breasted, chunkier-looking bird than the
Royal. Of course it gets really problematic if I start thinking of Elegant
Tern. If I'd seen these birds along the south-central California coast I'd
have called them Elegants in a second but for a bill that was just not
"stiletto-like" enough for that species.
I'd appreciate any help you can offer me in any future encounters with the
Royal tern in breeding plumage and what I should have tried to observe in this
sighting. Terns are hell.
Lou
Louis Nielsen
Reisterstown, MD
|