I'd like to weigh in a bit on the international debate relating to
ABA and Bird Watcher's Digest. The world has almost 10,000 bird
species and we in Maryland regularly focus on somewhere in the order
of 350 or so regular breeders, migrants, and accidentals. In all of
the U.S., that number swells to at most 850-900 species. When we put
on our blinders to the rest of the world's birds, we disregard most
of the planet's bird life, including particulars on many species that
may turn up on our shores.
I think the discussion of the growth of global birding does have some
link with globalization, or at least the shortening of distances
between continents thanks to modern travel, the Internet, etc. But I
imagine that at one time or another any North American birder stops
and gasps at the ostriches, hornbills, motmots, or parrots we can
readily see in zoos or on TV, and then we inevitably wonder about
their wild habitat and other wild avian neighbors. The same would be
natural for lovers of wine, cars, butterflies, fashion, etc.
Therefore, I don't think reading about international encounters with
birds needs to be a monetary or lifestyle question for many. Articles
about birds in other parts of the world expand our knowledge of birds
in general and help frame our awareness on issues such as how birds
are classified taxonomically, their habits, their roles in their
ecosystems. There have always been international stories on birds in
U.S.-focused publications such as Birding and Bird Watcher's Digest.
I would agree with those who say that a whole issue on grasslands or
an entire issue on international birding might be entirely
unappealing to some. I would also understand if some folks felt the
same way about Birding issues focused only on conservation issues.
That written, conservation awareness has become inextricable from
responsible birding. Part of adhering to the code of ethics of the
ABA or the personal code of anyone who cares about wild birds
includes respecting the birds' need for adequate habitat and
protection from disturbance. If you go to a well-known marsh and play
tapes for a black rail, your potentially harmful behavior presents a
disturbance risk that may compromise conservation efforts. In this
increasingly crowded state and country, I think, in short, the lines
between birding in North America and birding and thinking about
conservation issues are blurred these days, and so it's not
surprising that magazines like Birding take on more of these issues.
When discussing Americans' attitudes about foreign countries, I often
praise the British for considering the world their backyard.
Sometimes in the U.S., I think people get caught up in the backyard
as their world. That's secure and a personal choice. I feel that way
about my yard sometimes. But I also would not like the publications I
receive to ignore a growing body of amazing bird lore and knowledge
that is out there to enjoy. Over the last 20 years, birders have come
to understand that scarlet tanagers, wood thrushes, American
redstarts and Baltimore orioles, among many other species, spend
about a third of their year on Maryland breeding grounds. Where they
spend the rest has the world to do with our enjoyment of these birds
at home. Groups like the American Bird Conservancy and The Nature
Conservancy have taken their focus far beyond our borders for these
reasons. Kenn Kaufmann, in an attempt to help support growing
conservation awareness in the Latino community within our country and
beyond our borders, undertook the monumental and financially
unrewarding task of having his field guide translated into Spanish.
My opinion on the Birding issue is this: that there's always a place
for conservation and international stories, but that their place in
Birding is perhaps best served in but one or two of the articles per
issue. I too miss the identification articles and the regular mix of
birding location tips, North American focused articles, and the like.
But I will continue to look for those international stories that
highlight birds we rarely glimpse in books or on TV--or at all. Birds
know no boundaries and while the ABA does, I salute them for
sometimes going beyond them.
Howard Youth
Bethesda, MD
|