Message:

[

Previous   Next

]

By Topic:

[

Previous   Next

]

Subject:

Re: Perspective on Exotic Species

From:

Phil Davis

Reply-To:

Phil Davis

Date:

Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:15:39 -0400

Hi Norm:

Species like Western Meadowlarks have breed in Ohio and New York and 
have shown a pattern of vagrancy to the NE; also I don't know of any 
person or institution that keeps captive or caged Western 
Meadowlarks. Greater Flamingo showed a pattern of vagrancy to the NE 
after Hurricane Agnes in the 1970. Ditto for Northern Lapwing that 
shows a pattern of vagrancy from Europe into the maritimes, the NE, 
and down the eastern seaboard. The MD Southern Lapwing was found to 
be of questionable origin despite following the path of a hurricane 
that crossed directly over a place where other sightings in Florida 
were made a week before and also despite a pattern of range expansion 
in the Caribbean and Mexico.

I guess the point is that many factors are taken into consideration, 
by many people (i.e., by committee nine voting members) when these 
records committee decisions are made. There is no one set of 
standards or guidelines that apply in all cases. The records 
committee is just an opinion of nine people at a given point in time 
based on the knowledge available at the time. For example, the 
Greater Flamingo in question was considered to be an escape until 
Marshall Iliff did a detailed search of post-Agnes eastern records 
and built the supporting case for acceptance. Records Committee 
decisions are often reopened and reevaluated. One benefit to the 
records committee process is that there are no time constraints on 
the process; as opposed to the journal publications that have 
production deadlines to meet.

The fact that people can buy, for example, Monk Parakeets in pet 
stores for less than $100, or Black Swans from aviculturalists and 
raise them in their farm ponds (and not clip their wings or hind 
toes!) certainly affects the decision process.

The alternative would be to add every species seen in the state to 
the Official List, including Helmeted Guineafowl, Indian Peafowl, 
Sulfur-crested Cockatoos, Pied Crows, Rhode Island Reds, etc. ... 
probably not a viable approach ... [However, Barbara and I birded 
Hawai'i in March and saw and counted (per ABA and Clements Checklist 
rules) introduced and Hawai'i-accepted species including Red-vented 
Bulbul, Chukar, California Quail, three species of Francolins (Black, 
Gray, Erckle's), Red Junglefowl (but countable only in the highest 
elevations of Kaua'i), Kalij Pheasant, Spotted Dove, Zebra Dove, 
Rose-ringed Parakeet, Sky Lark, Northern Mockingbird, Japanese 
Bush-Warbler, White-rumped Shama, Melodious Laughing-Thrush, 
Red-Billed Leiothrix, Japanese White-Eye, Common Myna, House Sparrow, 
Common Waxbill, African Silverbill, Nutmeg Mannikin, Chestnut Munia, 
Java Sparrow, House Finch, Yellow-fronted Canary, Saffron Finch, 
Red-Crested and Yellow-billed Cardinals, and ... oh yes, House 
Sparrows and Western Meadowlarks (the latter were introduced to 
Hawaii in 1931!) What a crazy place!]

As to the ABA logic, you will have to ask them to defend it. I am 
just giving my interpretation of what I think is going on with them. 
Many people feel that once a species has been added to the ABA 
Checklist, it should not be removed, despite the species withering 
away within it's introduced and previously-accepted ABA range.

Good discussion.

Thanks!

Phil


At 14:12 06/14/2009, Norm Saunders wrote:
>If I understand your logic correctly, Phil, then a Western Meadowlark (for
>example), which is definitely not established in Maryland, and whose method
>of arrival in Maryland is essentially unknown, should not be accepted
>either.  In fact no bird that is not "established" in Maryland should be
>accepted onto the state list, birds such as Greater Flamingo, Northern
>Lapwing, Southern Lapwing, etc., etc.  Obviously, I'm missing something in
>your explanation (and also in the reasoning behind ABA editing their
>checklists to delist species).
>
>I think often of Chan Robbin's oft-repeated statement the "birds have wings
>and they use them."
>
>Not arguing....just trying to understand.
>
>Best,
>Norm

===================================================
Phil Davis, Secretary
MD/DC Records Committee
2549 Vale Court
Davidsonville, Maryland  21035     USA
301-261-0184
mailto:[log in to unmask]

MD/DCRC Web site:  http://www.MDBirds.org/mddcrc/rcindex.html
===================================================