I'd like to second Sherman's point. Many of us get extremely excited 
(understandably) when chasing a rare bird that we scarcely recognize any 
other bird. Our brains have an amazing ability to focus on what we think 
is important and to essentially black out everything else. In the 
context of eBird data, this is quite detrimental when answering "yes" to 
the question: "Are you submitting a *complete checklist?"*

If you choose to answer "yes," I recommend taking care to look at your 
surroundings and record the other avian life that's present. This takes 
practice and it's something I have to force myself to do when adrenaline 
is running high during a rarity chase.  No one is going to record every 
bird that's present, but it's important that eBird knows you are 
reporting every bird to the best of your ability. There's a critical 
difference between reporting zero Song Sparrows and not including Song 
Sparrow on an incomplete checklist.

If, in your excitement, you didn't remember to take at least a brief 
look around, I recommend answering "no" to the complete checklist 
question. Although we should all strive to answer "yes" to the complete 
checklist question, there's no shame in answering "no" every once in 
awhile - quite the opposite - it means you're taking care that you're 
entering your data properly.

Rob Ostrowski
MD eBird
Crofton, MD

On 2/24/2012 8:14 PM, Sherman Suter wrote:
> At the same time that eBird provides lots of useful features to help one chase rare birds (and keep track of one's lists), the system is also intended to accumulate useful data for analyses of trends in bird populations and distribution.  Reflecting that end, the data entry pages include the question "Are you submitting a complete checklist of the birds you were able to identify?"  The answer to this question should serve as a filter for separating checklists intended to add a tick to the observer's personal lists from those that could be taken to represent a survey of the birds present at a given location and date.
>
> As a glance at recent postings from Maryland will indicate, people often answer "yes" but clearly should have picked "no".  For example, many of the reports of the Pink-footed Goose are accompanied by supposedly complete checklists that include zero to a handful of other species.  I do not believe that anyone who successfully (or, actually, even unsuccessfully) chased that bird failed to also identify a Canada Goose at the same location.  (And if an observer cannot identify a Canada Goose, there would be reason to be suspicious of a claimed Pink-footed.)
>
> In the long term, the useful ness of eBird data will depend on people answering this question correctly.
>
> As an aside, I have also seen checklists (e.g., from some California reports) that appear to err in the other direction:  Despite a seemingly complete list of species (with numbers that make sense and even short supporting notes for rarities), the checklist is flagged as incomplete.
>
> Cheers and good birding.
>
> Sherman
>
> Sherman Suter
> Port Republic MD 20676  /  Alexandria VA 22307
> 
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the MDOSPREY list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=MDOSPREY&A=1
>


############################

To unsubscribe from the MDOSPREY list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=MDOSPREY&A=1