In a message dated 98-01-13 18:22:55 EST, Fran Saunders wrote: > If I remember correctly, some scopes have optional adapters > for cameras, and it makes for a better fit. Might be worth > looking into if you plan to use a scope for photos. > > Speaking of cameras, I was thinking of adding a tele lens for > bird photography. Anybody out there with some recommendations > as to make and size? Some people on our AZ trip had 400 mm > Sigmas, which they said worked well. > > Fran > Fran - I do a fair amount of picture-taking, especially of rarities, pelagics, etc. I use Nikon equipment and have both a Sigma 400/5.6 and 500/7.2 that I use depending upon lighting conditions. The more light and faster the shutter speed the better with these long lenses. With such "slow" lenses you almost have to use a fast film, like Kodachrome 200, which I prefer. The next step up in lenses (say a 400/2.8) is going to cost you $3K+. I use Sigma lenses and I'm very happy with them. Comparable Nikon lenses would cost 3-5x as much. I'm giving a talk to the Baltimore Club in February on "Rare birds of Maryland" if you'd like to check-out some of the results or talk more. I also have 800mm and 1000mm adapters for my Kowa scope that I can use the Nikon on. These need much light, and are really only good for documenting birds, not taking quality pictures. A tripod is mandatory. Regards, Mark Hoffman Sykesville, MD Mhoff36100@aol.com