Well said Monroe

On 5/1/06, Monroe Harden <> wrote:
>
> Is there some sort of guidelines for political spam on this list?  Is
> there an assumption that all subscribers agree with all
> environmental-related legislation and are opposed to all
> development?  Because it sure seems that way in the political messages that
> come through here every now and then.  I can understand a discussion or
> debate of specific issues, but political calls to action, like this one,
> filled with inflammatory words like "...would destroy the Arctic National
> Wildlife Refuge.." don't seem to be discussion topics related to birds and
> birding.
>
> Anyone here birded in the ANWR?  What did you see?  If a discussion of
> birding in Virginia is Off Topic, is a discussion of birding in Alaska also
> OT?  And if yes, then is a discussion of oil and where to drill for it in
> Alaska also OT?
>
> Monroe Harden
> Havre de Grace, MD
> 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Dean Newman <>
> >Sent: May 1, 2006 3:29 PM
> >To: 
> >Subject: [MDOSPREY] Light up the Senate switchboard now! ANWR Under
> Threat AGAIN
> >
> >Please drop what you're doing because here we go again. Senate leaders
> >are
> >again exploiting rising gas prices to rush a bill to the floor that
> >would
> >destroy the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and boost oil industry
> >profits. The
> >vote could come as early as Tuesday.
>
>
> <<SNIP>>
>
>